<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Extortion SEO &#8211; Take 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leslierohde.com/2009/05/05/extortion_seo_take_2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leslierohde.com/2009/05/05/extortion_seo_take_2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:54:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie</title>
		<link>http://www.leslierohde.com/2009/05/05/extortion_seo_take_2/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 21:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.leslierohde.com/?p=176#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Depends on what &quot;presence&quot; means.&#160; In Cydcor&#039;s case, they rank 1 and 2 for their name -- not hard since it is essentially a navigational query -- but that leaves 8 more slots open on page 1.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If presence means many other positive sites beyond just the corporate domain, then yes, that is precisely the issue.&#160; To really &quot;control brand&quot; you need to own at least 10 spots, maybe more.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why is this required?&#160; Because (1) bad news sells and (2) there is now no recourse for &quot;user generated&quot; bad news.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;m all for posting differing views, even really negative ones, but the lack of recourse is just a license to lie, cheat and steal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depends on what &quot;presence&quot; means.&nbsp; In Cydcor&#8217;s case, they rank 1 and 2 for their name &#8212; not hard since it is essentially a navigational query &#8212; but that leaves 8 more slots open on page 1.</p>
<p>If presence means many other positive sites beyond just the corporate domain, then yes, that is precisely the issue.&nbsp; To really &quot;control brand&quot; you need to own at least 10 spots, maybe more.</p>
<p>Why is this required?&nbsp; Because (1) bad news sells and (2) there is now no recourse for &quot;user generated&quot; bad news.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m all for posting differing views, even really negative ones, but the lack of recourse is just a license to lie, cheat and steal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bruce Jr</title>
		<link>http://www.leslierohde.com/2009/05/05/extortion_seo_take_2/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bruce Jr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 05:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.leslierohde.com/?p=176#comment-11</guid>
		<description>so... regardless of weather or not the bad press is deserved you seem to be saying that by not having a robust enough web presence a company is running the risk of negative SEO?

am I reading this correctly?

let&#039;s say cydcor had a huge SEO visibility... would that not negate the effectiveness of the complaint websites?

if so... now I have an additional tool to market my wares to corporate web sites... 

&quot;you&#039;d better be well positioned or you leave yourself open to...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so&#8230; regardless of weather or not the bad press is deserved you seem to be saying that by not having a robust enough web presence a company is running the risk of negative SEO?</p>
<p>am I reading this correctly?</p>
<p>let&#8217;s say cydcor had a huge SEO visibility&#8230; would that not negate the effectiveness of the complaint websites?</p>
<p>if so&#8230; now I have an additional tool to market my wares to corporate web sites&#8230; </p>
<p>&#8220;you&#8217;d better be well positioned or you leave yourself open to&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Crouch</title>
		<link>http://www.leslierohde.com/2009/05/05/extortion_seo_take_2/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Crouch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 15:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.leslierohde.com/?p=176#comment-10</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a lawyer, but I wonder if a person wanted to push this issue, if the site that posted the info could be liable in some way.&#160; I&#039;m sure the fact that the content was user generated would provide a good defense, but I don&#039;t see how this provides a complete safety net.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I started my internet business selling dvds about 8 years ago.&#160; I now offer a dvd wholesale list at Jillian Entertainment DOT com.&#160; I experienced the problem of unverified reviews a few years ago.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Luckily, the person that filed the review couldn&#039;t spell very well and didn&#039;t spell my company name right.&#160; So when someone searches for &quot;Jillian Entertainment&quot; the review doesn&#039;t show in the results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, they did spell my name correctly, so when someone searches for Brent Crouch, well, there it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where&#039;s that hacker that hacked Brad out of the SERPS a few year ago.&#160; Does that hack still work?&#160;&#160; :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a lawyer, but I wonder if a person wanted to push this issue, if the site that posted the info could be liable in some way.&nbsp; I&#8217;m sure the fact that the content was user generated would provide a good defense, but I don&#8217;t see how this provides a complete safety net.</p>
<p>I started my internet business selling dvds about 8 years ago.&nbsp; I now offer a dvd wholesale list at Jillian Entertainment DOT com.&nbsp; I experienced the problem of unverified reviews a few years ago.</p>
<p>Luckily, the person that filed the review couldn&#8217;t spell very well and didn&#8217;t spell my company name right.&nbsp; So when someone searches for &quot;Jillian Entertainment&quot; the review doesn&#8217;t show in the results.</p>
<p>However, they did spell my name correctly, so when someone searches for Brent Crouch, well, there it is.</p>
<p>Where&#8217;s that hacker that hacked Brad out of the SERPS a few year ago.&nbsp; Does that hack still work?&nbsp;&nbsp; <img src='http://www.leslierohde.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.leslierohde.com/2009/05/05/extortion_seo_take_2/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 08:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.leslierohde.com/?p=176#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Heh, this one hits a little close to home.&#160; I worked for a company under the Cydcor umbrella for about a week back in early &#039;07, and my experience resonates with those reviews/complaints.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, the name &quot;Cydcor&quot; was hidden from us (new recruits) for the first 4 days until the official &quot;business opportunity&quot; was presented, and it was then that I went home, Googled the name, saw those same complaints and how they mirrored my situation and then I got the heck out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So I suppose depending on your perspective, having those pages ranked highly may be a good thing.&#160; I&#039;m certainly glad I found them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, this one hits a little close to home.&nbsp; I worked for a company under the Cydcor umbrella for about a week back in early &#8217;07, and my experience resonates with those reviews/complaints.</p>
<p>In fact, the name &quot;Cydcor&quot; was hidden from us (new recruits) for the first 4 days until the official &quot;business opportunity&quot; was presented, and it was then that I went home, Googled the name, saw those same complaints and how they mirrored my situation and then I got the heck out.</p>
<p>So I suppose depending on your perspective, having those pages ranked highly may be a good thing.&nbsp; I&#8217;m certainly glad I found them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
